Nowadays Outlook is the most popular email application that is used to send and receive bulk of emails in an organization as well as personal level. It must be maintained and upgraded timely otherwise many issues may arise.

Many times, it is difficult for users to execute and understand Outlook search with updated edition of application. As Search option, is the most important feature of the Outlook application. It helps to perform a specific search of a defined criterion. Best package for switzerland. It helps in navigating through mails and other components quite proficiently. In the following section, we will discuss the trouble faced by the users. In Outlook 2016 for Mac, users receive a message “No Results,” when they try to search specific mail message or task items are not displayed in Task folder.

Click at the arrow next to 'Search Tools' ribbon and choose 'Indexing Status'. You should see a similar information message when indexing is completed 'Outlook has finished indexing all your items'. Additional help.-If Outlook Search still does not work, then try the following: 1.

Moreover, when users search for mail items by utilizing Mac OS spotlight search, the search is not successful. If Outlook for Mac 2016 has some special characters such as *, /, >, +, @, etc. Then, users need to change the identity name by following the steps mentioned below: • View Profile Name • Select Go >> Applications. • Click on MS Outlook >> Show Package Contents • Increase Contents, SharedSupport >> Outlook Profile Manager • Change Profile Name • Open Identity folder of Outlook 2016 from the mentioned location: • Now, rename the identity name by removing the special characters • Confirm the changes by again viewing the profile name. Solution 3: Remove the tab of Privacy. If the user is still facing problem then, Spotlight index may get corrupted.

To resolve this, user needs to re-index the Spotlight Index by following few steps: • Select Apple menu then, go to system preference >> Spotlight • Click on the privacy tab and now drag the folder, which user wants to index to list of locations that is prevented from Spotlight search • Choose the folder which is added and remove it from the list by clicking on the remove (-) button • Now, quite the preferences of system and the Spotlight will re-index folder contents.

I'm on the last straw with Outlook 2016 for Mac. Every couple of months, Outlook crashes and the index just gets blown away and search doesn't work. The only fix is to reinstall Office, resetup all of my accounts (I have 7) and get all of my signatures put back. This is absolutely ridiculous and, frankly, I've had it. What is the fix for this beyond reinstalling Outlook once a quarter or more?

It's either this gets fixed or I have to move to something else. I don't have time to constantly reinstall Office. It's beyond frustrating. I do IT for a living and I know how this stuff works and I can't fix it. Hi Scott, According to your description, the search function in Outlook for Mac constantly didn’t work. In this case, I would suggest you try to rebuild search index on your Mac to see if the issue can be fixed.

Here are the steps: 1. Choose Apple menu > System Preferences, then click Spotlight. Click the Privacy tab. Drag the folder or disk that you want to index again to the list of locations that Spotlight is prevented from searching. Or click the Add (+) button and select the folder or disk to add. From the same list of locations, select the folder or disk that you just added. Then click the Remove (–) button to remove it from the list.

Quit System Preferences. Spotlight will reindex the contents of the folder or disk. Note: Depending on your Mac and the contents of its hard disk, re-indexing may take several hours to days. Until this process is finished, Spotlight won’t know the contents of your disks and neither will Outlook.

All lists like contacts, events, notes etc. Are generated by the Spotlight searches.

Meanwhile, there is an article describing some other things you should be aware of in Outlook for Mac related to this issue. You can refer to the article below for more details. Regards, Yang.